Verdict good first issues (C#)

Verdict.AspNetCore is not trim or AOT safe: six Results.Json(T) sites need JsonTypeInfo 5 days ago

bug help wanted

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

`Error.ToString()` prints the raw exception, defeating `sanitize: true` about 2 months ago

bug good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

Verdict.Async has no MatchAsync, so an async pipeline has nowhere to land about 2 months ago

enhancement good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

A manual publish dispatch with dry_run=false ships any branch with no tag check about 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

CI collects coverage that no threshold can fail the build on about 2 months ago

enhancement help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The examples project is outside the solution, so CI never compiles it about 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The whole repo tops out at net8.0 and the AOT flags are keyed to the literal 'net8.0' about 2 months ago

enhancement help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

Design discussion: should `Verdict.Async` offer `ValueTask` overloads? about 2 months ago

enhancement help wanted question

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The docs index links to eight package guides that do not exist about 2 months ago

documentation help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The netstandard2.0 assemblies ship without ever being tested about 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

Nothing verifies the Native AOT and trimming claim about 2 months ago

enhancement help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

A `MultiResult` and everything derived from it share one pooled buffer, so disposing either breaks the other about 2 months ago

bug help wanted question

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The JSON converters do not round-trip about 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

`AddVerdictProblemDetails` registers services that nothing consumes about 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The allocation gate covers only `Result<int>` in the core package about 2 months ago

enhancement help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

Broken links, three different test counts, and the missing `[Unreleased]` heading about 2 months ago

documentation good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

The benchmark runner ignores its command line arguments about 2 months ago

bug good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

`MultiResult.ToString()` throws `ObjectDisposedException` after `DisposeErrors()` about 2 months ago

bug good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

`LogError` and the custom-level `Log` silently drop `Error.Exception` about 2 months ago

bug good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

master is red: ProblemDetailsFactory's static defaults leak across parallel tests 2 months ago

bug help wanted

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

`ErrorCollection.Create` leaks the pooled buffer if enumeration throws 2 months ago

bug good first issue

BaryoDev/Verdict

10

Start with zero-allocation core. Scale to enterprise features through opt-in packages. Never compromise on speed.

C#

#aot#csharp#dotnet#error-handling#functional-programming#netstandard#nuget#performance#railway-oriented-programming#result-pattern#trimming#zero-allocation

BaryoDev/Verdict

Open Issues Need Help