Open Issues Need Help
View All on GitHub feature request good first issue awaiting response customer
NVIDIA/cuopt NVIDIA/cuopt GPU accelerated decision optimization
Open project →
965
GPU accelerated decision optimization
Cuda
#cuda#gpu#linear-programming#optimization
[FEA] Java API Support for cuOpt 9 days ago
feature request good first issue awaiting response backlog
NVIDIA/cuopt NVIDIA/cuopt GPU accelerated decision optimization
Open project →
965
GPU accelerated decision optimization
Cuda
#cuda#gpu#linear-programming#optimization
feature request good first issue awaiting response
NVIDIA/cuopt NVIDIA/cuopt GPU accelerated decision optimization
Open project →
965
GPU accelerated decision optimization
Cuda
#cuda#gpu#linear-programming#optimization
[FEA] Add QP Notebook examples and QP Data Sets 7 months ago
feature request good first issue
NVIDIA/cuopt NVIDIA/cuopt GPU accelerated decision optimization
Open project →
965
GPU accelerated decision optimization
Cuda
#cuda#gpu#linear-programming#optimization
[BUG] Fix naming issue with mip and lp solver settings about 1 year ago
AI Summary: The task is to resolve a naming inconsistency between the cuOpt thin client and the SDK for solver settings related to Mixed Integer Programming (MIP) and Linear Programming (LP). Specifically, parameter names like `relative_mip_gap` in the thin client need to be updated to match the SDK's naming convention (`mip_relative_gap`). This involves modifying the `thin_client_solver_settings.py` file to align the parameter names.
Complexity:
3/5
bug good first issue
NVIDIA/cuopt NVIDIA/cuopt GPU accelerated decision optimization
Open project →
965
GPU accelerated decision optimization
Cuda
#cuda#gpu#linear-programming#optimization